3M Wins First Bair Hugger Case; 8 More Cases Prepare For Trial

The first question to the jury, in summary: “Did plaintiff prove that Bair Hugger was unreasonably dangerous and that a safe alternative was available?” The alternative, the Court ruled, had to be another air-blowing device to meet defective design requirements (it could not be HotDog®, another electric warming system, or a water-based system). The jury’s [...]

By | 2018-05-31T16:09:16+00:00 May 30th, 2018|